<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Category romances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/12/17/more-on-category-romances-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/12/17/more-on-category-romances-2/</link>
	<description>Blah Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:06:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Claudia</title>
		<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/12/17/more-on-category-romances-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10996</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/?p=1402#comment-10996</guid>
		<description>Sorry folks, something weird happened with my mouse buttons and I got weird cut and paste. gotta troubleshoot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry folks, something weird happened with my mouse buttons and I got weird cut and paste. gotta troubleshoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudia</title>
		<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/12/17/more-on-category-romances-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10995</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/?p=1402#comment-10995</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m 32 and have always enjoyed categories. I first started reading them in my teens because their fast turnover meant I as always reshelving them at my library job. I even lifted one of my faves, Escape Me Never :)

I worked summers at my hometown library and started reading the Harlequins because the turnover meant I was forever reshelving them. I&#039;ve always been a voracious reader and didn&#039;t find the Euro-centric slant any more distracting than the plots of the sci fi and horror books I loved. I stopped reading romance when I went away to college. It seems odd now, but I never bothered to join the public library in my college town.

I came back to romance for pure escapism in my late 20s (I&#039;m 32). I&#039;d suffered severe reading burnout after processing thousands of pages of info for my Microsoft  certification and had gone to Borders on a mission to find some mindless fun. How to Marry a Marquis caught my attention--the whole Rules and How to Marry a Millionair slant-- and I soon found other sensual regency authors that I liked. I rediscoved category at Waldenbooks, preferring  Temptation and Desires, in that order.  I would only buy other series books that piqued my interest in some way: physically disabled heriones, truly odd couples,  unusual professions, etc. 

I&#039;m reading very little romance because so much of it is the same. I have no more auto buy authors because</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m 32 and have always enjoyed categories. I first started reading them in my teens because their fast turnover meant I as always reshelving them at my library job. I even lifted one of my faves, Escape Me Never :)</p>
<p>I worked summers at my hometown library and started reading the Harlequins because the turnover meant I was forever reshelving them. I&#8217;ve always been a voracious reader and didn&#8217;t find the Euro-centric slant any more distracting than the plots of the sci fi and horror books I loved. I stopped reading romance when I went away to college. It seems odd now, but I never bothered to join the public library in my college town.</p>
<p>I came back to romance for pure escapism in my late 20s (I&#8217;m 32). I&#8217;d suffered severe reading burnout after processing thousands of pages of info for my Microsoft  certification and had gone to Borders on a mission to find some mindless fun. How to Marry a Marquis caught my attention&#8211;the whole Rules and How to Marry a Millionair slant&#8211; and I soon found other sensual regency authors that I liked. I rediscoved category at Waldenbooks, preferring  Temptation and Desires, in that order.  I would only buy other series books that piqued my interest in some way: physically disabled heriones, truly odd couples,  unusual professions, etc. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m reading very little romance because so much of it is the same. I have no more auto buy authors because</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alisonkent.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who are our heroines?</title>
		<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/12/17/more-on-category-romances-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10993</link>
		<dc:creator>alisonkent.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who are our heroines?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/?p=1402#comment-10993</guid>
		<description>[...] In comments below to this entry and this entry and this entry, several visitors made references to &#8220;our grandmother&#8217;s&#8221; Harlequins. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In comments below to this entry and this entry and this entry, several visitors made references to &#8220;our grandmother&#8217;s&#8221; Harlequins. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison</title>
		<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/12/17/more-on-category-romances-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10981</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/?p=1402#comment-10981</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;While I don&#039;t need to identify with a heroine in order to enjoy a book, my problem with most Hs involves the writer&#039;s voice.  Most of the characters are in their twenties, but they sound like my 50 and 60 yo bookstore customers.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;ve thought about this, too.  While writing all my Blazes, I&#039;ve had 2 or 3 twenty-somethings underfoot *g*.  I hear them talk, hear their friends, eavesdrop shamelessly to pick up their interests, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>While I don&#8217;t need to identify with a heroine in order to enjoy a book, my problem with most Hs involves the writer&#8217;s voice.  Most of the characters are in their twenties, but they sound like my 50 and 60 yo bookstore customers.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve thought about this, too.  While writing all my Blazes, I&#8217;ve had 2 or 3 twenty-somethings underfoot *g*.  I hear them talk, hear their friends, eavesdrop shamelessly to pick up their interests, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drea</title>
		<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/12/17/more-on-category-romances-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10980</link>
		<dc:creator>Drea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/?p=1402#comment-10980</guid>
		<description>I began reading Harlequins a couple of years ago when a co-worker lent me her gIRL-gEAR books (this led to a glom of Alison&#039;s single titles).  I generally read HSR, Blaze, and H/Historicals (Categories make up less than 10% of my book budget).  I&#039;m in my twenties (unmarried/no children), but I enjoy so-called family stories.  Like Wendy, I find that the emotions are more developed.

While I don&#039;t need to identify with a heroine in order to enjoy a book, my problem with most Hs involves the writer&#039;s voice.  Most of the characters are in their twenties, but they sound like my 50 and 60 yo bookstore customers.  It&#039;s possible for a book to reflect contemporary culture without resorting to product placement (Erin McCarthy&#039;s &quot;The Pregnancy Test&quot; (Kensington/Brava) is a great example).  

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s necessary for every heroine to be in her early twenties either - I really enjoy books with heroines in their 30s, 40s, etc.  Lastly, there are more women than men in colleges today, but that&#039;s not reflected in the vast number of H&#039;s heroines.  I understand that, as an online romance reader, I&#039;m probably in the minority;).

Many of my (Harlequin buying) customers really enjoyed Pamela Britton&#039;s &quot;Dangerous Curves.&quot;  I think it&#039;ll be interesting to see whether H&#039;s Nascar line succeeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I began reading Harlequins a couple of years ago when a co-worker lent me her gIRL-gEAR books (this led to a glom of Alison&#8217;s single titles).  I generally read HSR, Blaze, and H/Historicals (Categories make up less than 10% of my book budget).  I&#8217;m in my twenties (unmarried/no children), but I enjoy so-called family stories.  Like Wendy, I find that the emotions are more developed.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t need to identify with a heroine in order to enjoy a book, my problem with most Hs involves the writer&#8217;s voice.  Most of the characters are in their twenties, but they sound like my 50 and 60 yo bookstore customers.  It&#8217;s possible for a book to reflect contemporary culture without resorting to product placement (Erin McCarthy&#8217;s &#8220;The Pregnancy Test&#8221; (Kensington/Brava) is a great example).  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s necessary for every heroine to be in her early twenties either &#8211; I really enjoy books with heroines in their 30s, 40s, etc.  Lastly, there are more women than men in colleges today, but that&#8217;s not reflected in the vast number of H&#8217;s heroines.  I understand that, as an online romance reader, I&#8217;m probably in the minority;).</p>
<p>Many of my (Harlequin buying) customers really enjoyed Pamela Britton&#8217;s &#8220;Dangerous Curves.&#8221;  I think it&#8217;ll be interesting to see whether H&#8217;s Nascar line succeeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison</title>
		<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/12/17/more-on-category-romances-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10971</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 22:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/?p=1402#comment-10971</guid>
		<description>Wendy - The online minority issue has occurred to me as well.  I think maybe we&#039;re all more vocal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendy &#8211; The online minority issue has occurred to me as well.  I think maybe we&#8217;re all more vocal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy - super_librarian</title>
		<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/12/17/more-on-category-romances-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10970</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy - super_librarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 22:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/?p=1402#comment-10970</guid>
		<description>Well I&#039;m 30 and have been reading categories since my early 20s.  But I understand I am not &quot;normal.&quot;

I think Harlequin&#039;s problem is the Presents line.  Seriously.  When non-category readers *think* about Harlequin I *think* they see a gawd-a$$ awful HP title like &quot;Virgin For Sale&quot; swimming through their minds.  I do think these types of stories have their place in the romance world, but honestly do they have have to be marketted in such a cheestastic way?

I used to read across most of the lines, but these days I mainly stick to HSR.  Even though the vast majority are &quot;family stories&quot; and are set in small towns, I find they have a meatier emotional undercurrent to them.  

The line I&#039;m really upset about is Desire.  This used to be my favorite line, but I haven&#039;t bought a new one in AGES.  Honestly, a girl can handle only so many &quot;Dynasties&quot;, continuing series and sheiks before she wants to ram her head into a wall.

Also, I think as online romance readers we have to remember that we are a minority.  Not every romance reader is active in the online community, and I suspect these are the folks who are eating up the secret baby, Greek tycoon, 35-year-old virgin heroine books.  But I could be wrong....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;m 30 and have been reading categories since my early 20s.  But I understand I am not &#8220;normal.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think Harlequin&#8217;s problem is the Presents line.  Seriously.  When non-category readers *think* about Harlequin I *think* they see a gawd-a$$ awful HP title like &#8220;Virgin For Sale&#8221; swimming through their minds.  I do think these types of stories have their place in the romance world, but honestly do they have have to be marketted in such a cheestastic way?</p>
<p>I used to read across most of the lines, but these days I mainly stick to HSR.  Even though the vast majority are &#8220;family stories&#8221; and are set in small towns, I find they have a meatier emotional undercurrent to them.  </p>
<p>The line I&#8217;m really upset about is Desire.  This used to be my favorite line, but I haven&#8217;t bought a new one in AGES.  Honestly, a girl can handle only so many &#8220;Dynasties&#8221;, continuing series and sheiks before she wants to ram her head into a wall.</p>
<p>Also, I think as online romance readers we have to remember that we are a minority.  Not every romance reader is active in the online community, and I suspect these are the folks who are eating up the secret baby, Greek tycoon, 35-year-old virgin heroine books.  But I could be wrong&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vernieda</title>
		<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/12/17/more-on-category-romances-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10964</link>
		<dc:creator>Vernieda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/?p=1402#comment-10964</guid>
		<description>The thing about the Luna is that it&#039;s &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; marketed as a category imprint.  They&#039;re considered standalone novels and if you talk to several of the Luna authors -- especially the 2005 and beyond batch -- their focus and interest is on the fantasy world and heroine&#039;s journey.  The romance is secondary to the main plot to many of them, and a few of them have &quot;romantic subplots&quot; that you&#039;d totally miss if you sneezed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing about the Luna is that it&#8217;s <i>not</i> marketed as a category imprint.  They&#8217;re considered standalone novels and if you talk to several of the Luna authors &#8212; especially the 2005 and beyond batch &#8212; their focus and interest is on the fantasy world and heroine&#8217;s journey.  The romance is secondary to the main plot to many of them, and a few of them have &#8220;romantic subplots&#8221; that you&#8217;d totally miss if you sneezed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: May</title>
		<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/12/17/more-on-category-romances-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10963</link>
		<dc:creator>May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 04:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/?p=1402#comment-10963</guid>
		<description>Meril brought up Luna, and I&#039;ve read a few of them. I agree with her, because friends I&#039;ve turned onto Luna can&#039;t believe Luna&#039;s a Sil/Har imprint. 

But it doesn&#039;t make them inclined to try the categories. 

Alison, I think those storylines people brought up (sheiks, etc) are still escapism. But they need a much more modern spin on it. 

The storyline--at least my take on it--behind Desire is a rich guy sweeping the heroine away. 

It&#039;s still relevant. Just needs to be &#039;modernized.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meril brought up Luna, and I&#8217;ve read a few of them. I agree with her, because friends I&#8217;ve turned onto Luna can&#8217;t believe Luna&#8217;s a Sil/Har imprint. </p>
<p>But it doesn&#8217;t make them inclined to try the categories. </p>
<p>Alison, I think those storylines people brought up (sheiks, etc) are still escapism. But they need a much more modern spin on it. </p>
<p>The storyline&#8211;at least my take on it&#8211;behind Desire is a rich guy sweeping the heroine away. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s still relevant. Just needs to be &#8216;modernized.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daria</title>
		<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/12/17/more-on-category-romances-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10962</link>
		<dc:creator>Daria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/?p=1402#comment-10962</guid>
		<description>an interesting comment from an avid reader of romances today, who asked to keep anon. Her point was that she loves reading romances about modern, worldly women who find unexpected love, but &quot;most romances are written by small-town, married-to-high-school-sweetheart women and it shows.&quot; Maybe that&#039;s the &quot;stigma&quot; that was mentioned earlier. That when the issues are closer to the heart of a contemporary urban young woman, the reader just doesn&#039;t buy the realism... at the same time, I&#039;ve been always surprised by the fact that most women my age seem even more conservative than their mothers, even in the creative occupations which should be bohemian by definition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>an interesting comment from an avid reader of romances today, who asked to keep anon. Her point was that she loves reading romances about modern, worldly women who find unexpected love, but &#8220;most romances are written by small-town, married-to-high-school-sweetheart women and it shows.&#8221; Maybe that&#8217;s the &#8220;stigma&#8221; that was mentioned earlier. That when the issues are closer to the heart of a contemporary urban young woman, the reader just doesn&#8217;t buy the realism&#8230; at the same time, I&#8217;ve been always surprised by the fact that most women my age seem even more conservative than their mothers, even in the creative occupations which should be bohemian by definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

