<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About the RWA disqualified publishers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/08/14/about-the-rwa-disqualified-publishers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/08/14/about-the-rwa-disqualified-publishers/</link>
	<description>Blah Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mary Stella</title>
		<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/08/14/about-the-rwa-disqualified-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-10114</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Stella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/?p=1262#comment-10114</guid>
		<description>If anyone scrolls back to this entry, I thought you might all like to know that RWA informed Medallion Press that their status was revoked in error.  My publisher has been reinstated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone scrolls back to this entry, I thought you might all like to know that RWA informed Medallion Press that their status was revoked in error.  My publisher has been reinstated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Stella</title>
		<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/08/14/about-the-rwa-disqualified-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-9999</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Stella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/?p=1262#comment-9999</guid>
		<description>I have issues with the way this was handled all around, because I can find nothing in RWA policy that said, &quot;Write all the publishers and require them to recertify.&quot;  Sure, it&#039;s easy for me to be ticked because I&#039;m directly affected, as a Medallion author, but if policy says, &quot;Contact a publisher if you receive a complaint against them&quot; then that&#039;s what should have been done instead of requesting the figures from all recognized publishers.

For the record, Medallion meets all the requirements for publisher recognition.  I know this from the distribution and sales of my own book.  If they are taking a stand on principle, then I support them, regardless of the outcome for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have issues with the way this was handled all around, because I can find nothing in RWA policy that said, &#8220;Write all the publishers and require them to recertify.&#8221;  Sure, it&#8217;s easy for me to be ticked because I&#8217;m directly affected, as a Medallion author, but if policy says, &#8220;Contact a publisher if you receive a complaint against them&#8221; then that&#8217;s what should have been done instead of requesting the figures from all recognized publishers.</p>
<p>For the record, Medallion meets all the requirements for publisher recognition.  I know this from the distribution and sales of my own book.  If they are taking a stand on principle, then I support them, regardless of the outcome for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison</title>
		<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/08/14/about-the-rwa-disqualified-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-9984</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 06:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/?p=1262#comment-9984</guid>
		<description>If Medallion dropped the ball, they dropped the ball.  My real interest is in whether or not the office (I&#039;m assuming) actually told them they were having trouble with another publisher - and if so, how unprofessional was that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Medallion dropped the ball, they dropped the ball.  My real interest is in whether or not the office (I&#8217;m assuming) actually told them they were having trouble with another publisher &#8211; and if so, how unprofessional was that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelle</title>
		<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/08/14/about-the-rwa-disqualified-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-9982</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 05:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/?p=1262#comment-9982</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree w/ Medallion here.  They dropped the ball by forgetting to (or refusing to) send the requested materials and documentations to RWA.  It&#039;s not that hard to prove the sales records.  I mean you have to do it anyways to create royalty statements, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree w/ Medallion here.  They dropped the ball by forgetting to (or refusing to) send the requested materials and documentations to RWA.  It&#8217;s not that hard to prove the sales records.  I mean you have to do it anyways to create royalty statements, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maddie Black</title>
		<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/08/14/about-the-rwa-disqualified-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-9977</link>
		<dc:creator>Maddie Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/?p=1262#comment-9977</guid>
		<description>Well, Debbie Dixon certainly knows her business. I wouldn&#039;t doubt her response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Debbie Dixon certainly knows her business. I wouldn&#8217;t doubt her response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/08/14/about-the-rwa-disqualified-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-9975</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/?p=1262#comment-9975</guid>
		<description>This just gets curiouser and curiouser!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just gets curiouser and curiouser!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/2005/08/14/about-the-rwa-disqualified-publishers/comment-page-1/#comment-9974</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alisonkent.com/blog/?p=1262#comment-9974</guid>
		<description>Excellent letter from Medallion, Alison. They raise a lot of valid points. Thanks for letting us know about it! 

Heather</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent letter from Medallion, Alison. They raise a lot of valid points. Thanks for letting us know about it! </p>
<p>Heather</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
